disassociated.com Flickr photos

Where Keyboard Shortcuts Win

Posted by John Lampard on Monday, 7 January, 2008 to the technology subset

Where Keyboard Shortcuts Win.

For the point and click generation of software developers. Just when should keyboard shortcuts be included as a feature of an application? For very common tasks, such as opening and closing files, and/or for tasks performed less frequently, though several times when they are?

When you’re doing the same thing over and over - not even necessarily right after each other (e.g. Paste, Paste, Paste, Paste…) but just several times in close proximity — it’s a huge win to have a keyboard shortcut. E.g. “Find Next”, or deleting several non-adjacent items in a list. The key to understanding Tog’s argument about why the mouse is faster is that there’s a hidden delay where you stop to recall the actual keys to press for a shortcut. But with repetitive actions, you only suffer that penalty the first time. Even if you waste two seconds remembering that the shortcut for Find Next is Command-G, you save time (versus using the mouse) if you invoke it several times in a row.

Being fully conversant with all, or most, of an application’s keyboard shortcuts can save a lot time, and once you’re in the swing of things, certainly feels much faster than using a mouse.

As an aside this brings to mind a conversation I had with a creative director, some years ago, who was looking to hire a junior web designer. He was only interested in considering applicants who “knew all the keyboard shortcuts” of the various apps they would be working with.

How’s that for a case of keyboard shortcuts winning out?

Tags: , , , ,
Permalink | Contact | disassociated.com

Comments are welcome, please keep them relevant to the topic at hand. If you want to talk about something else, please contact me. Spam, SEO keyword "names", and crassness will not be tolerated.