disassociated.com Flickr photos

Pringles eats consumption tax for breakfast

Posted by John Lampard on Monday, 7 July, 2008 to the comment subset

Good news for a Monday morning, a time when my dependence on comfort food is usually higher than at any other time of the week: Pringles are no longer deemed a “potato crisp” and are therefore not subject to a consumption tax.

Friday’s judgement is likely to save manufacturer Procter & Gamble Co (P&G) millions of pounds and ensure its customers will not have to pay more for the distinctive-tasting snack in a tube. P&G had gone to the High Court in London to appeal a VAT and Duties Tribunal decision in May that the snack was subject to VAT as it was a potato crisp product, unlike most foodstuffs that are exempt from the tax. With global sales of one billion dollars, P&G had argued Pringles were not similar to potato crisps, due to their texture, “mouth melt” taste, uniform colour and regular shape which “is not found in nature”.

Tags: , , , ,
Permalink | Contact | disassociated.com

Comments are welcome, please keep them relevant to the topic at hand. If you want to talk about something else, please contact me. Spam, SEO keyword "names", and crassness will not be tolerated.