The arrival of what is effectively a smartphone you wear on your wrist, in watch style, caused a splash a month or so ago, but how about the codex rotundus, a circle shaped book, about nine centimetres across, that almost looks like it could be worn as a watch, as wearable technology.
And dating from the late fifteenth century, on top of that. How old hat does this make that smartwatch look then?
Are we perhaps not mature enough as a people to be using certain of the technologies we have developed – many of which were intended to make life easier – that, through misapplication, could bring about our annihilation? It is a question that is troubling a growing number of scientists and eminent thinkers:
“We’re getting these more and more powerful technologies that we can use to have more and more wide-ranging impacts on the world and ourselves, and our level of wisdom seems to be growing more slowly. It’s a bit like a child who’s getting their hands on a loaded pistol – they should be playing with rattles or toy soldiers,” Bostrom tells me when we meet in his sunlit office at the FHI, surrounded by yet more whiteboards. “As a species, we’re giving ourselves access to technologies that should really have a higher maturity level. We don’t have an option – we’re going to get these technologies. So we just have to mature more rapidly.”
A little over one hundred years ago people were listening to recorded music on phonograph cylinders. Disc records were also around, and for a time the two formats competed with each other, before records eventually won out.
When I checked the headlines last Monday morning, an article about Ello, a social networking alternative to Facebook, caught my eye. The Vermont based startup behind Ello felt that “none of the social networks are fun anymore.” This sounded promising.
Ello is wtf. Ello is not crypto. Ello reminds me of the old days. Ello is kinda queer. Ello is features coming soon. Ello is a silo. Ello is not brogramming. Ello is not the same silo as the other silo. Ello is not the cloud. Ello is mobile-last. Ello is sort of an accident. Ello is “do you have any invites to Ello?” Ello is pretty and manospaced. Ello is an ouroboros. Ello is your new avi.
How on Earth do I score an invite, I wondered? After all, I don’t want noise, I want signal, I want a silo that is not the same as the other silo. Just as I was about to clock off for the day, I happened upon some of Andy Baio’s thoughts on the social network that promised to make social networks fun once more. Posted on Ello, no less:
The Ello founders are positioning it as an alternative to other social networks – they won’t sell your data or show you ads. “You are not the product.” If they were independently-funded and run as some sort of co-op, bootstrapped until profitable, maybe that’s plausible. Hard, but possible. But VCs don’t give money out of goodwill, and taking VC funding – even seed funding – creates outside pressures that shape the inevitable direction of a company.
Does accepting some Venture Capital funding mean that it’s over – in terms of being a “fun” social network at least – or is it too soon, way too soon, to decide?
Say what you will about Bitcoins, but they are certainly secure. Seemingly it would take many billions of years to break through their private key encryption. However there is a caveat, under Moores’ Law computing power is supposed to double every two years, so that colossal time span stands to be substantially reduced. Maybe.
Assuming computing speed doubles every year (Moore’s law says 2 years, but we’ll err on the side of caution), then in 59 years it’ll only take 1.13 years. So your coins are safe for the next 60 years without a change to the algorithms used to protect the blockchain. However, I would expect the algorithms to be changed long before it’s feasible to break the protection they provide.
The dark of night has become a thing of the past, an anachronism, in an age where there’s always a light switched on somewhere… how’s that for a take on light pollution from US astronomer Tyler Nordgren?
“We’re losing the stars,” the 45-year-old astronomer told me. “Think about it this way: For 4.5 billion years, Earth has been a planet with a day and a night. Since the electric light bulb was invented, we’ve progressively lit up the night, and have gotten rid of it. Now 99 percent of the population lives under skies filled with light pollution.”