The nearly three and a half metre long model of the USS Enterprise, used during the production of the original “Star Trek” television show, that has been suspended from the roof of the gift shop in the Smithsonian Institution for almost the last fourteen years, is to be restored.
San Francisco based illustrator and concept artist Nick Acosta has created a series of images depicting scenes from the orginal “Star Trek” television show, that, by the way, first went to air forty-eight years ago, in widescreen format. This I could get into I think…
Future governments could take a variety of forms, including cyberocracy, rule through “effective use of information”, an artificial intelligence singleton, being rule through an intelligent machine of some sort, Paleolithic politics, should the apocalypse strike, or even a “Star Trek” like global democratic government:
Thus far, globalization appears to be unfolding across three stages. The first phase is cultural globalization, the second economic, and the third political. The first and second stages are largely complete, though some protectionism still exists. The final stage has proven to be the most difficult; nation-states are incredibly hesitant to give up sovereignty. But the dissolution of borders may be an inexorable trend that underlies civilizational development, as witnessed by the unification of China under the Qin Dynasty, the formation of the United States of America, the current experiment known as the European Union, and the likely unification of all African countries. Taken to its logical conclusion, we may eventually achieve a democratic planetary government.
With regions across the globe seemingly demanding more autonomy though, I’m not sure we’re actually going in this direction.
It’s interesting to see the first “Trek” film, Star Trek: The Motion Picture, that was met with – to put it mildly – a mixed reception, appears to have almost the best box office take of the lot. I think that has much to do with its nostalgic appeal at the time of its 1979 release.
I wonder how the upcoming “Star Wars” films will fare, compared to the earlier installments of the saga, in this regard?
I’ve seen a fair few “Star Trek” episodes and movies, but cannot recall seeing any of the crew shopping, dining out, or in situations where they are required to fork out money for goods and services. The exception may be when they’ve time travelled into the past, but no transactions appear to take place in the twenty-third century or beyond.
In Star Trek, most economic value is created by essentially free goods. That is the simple explanation as to why we don’t see money exchanged. That is the point of free. But more to the point, one has to think about how much is free in terms of allocations. Researchers on happiness like Justin Wolfers, in my reading, seem to indicate that once we have about $100 million in wealth (based on today’s goods), that is about as happy as people can get. Marginal utility is effectively zero in wealth beyond that point. In Star Trek, at least the closer you get to Sector 001 (or the Solar System), everyone has what, in today’s terms, would be $100 million or more in wealth. The free goods that are provided from housing to technology to services and to Earth and Earth orbit transportation are what would $100 millionaires can get today. They may be the very same humans who are motivated by wealth acquisition as we have today but the economic problem of “not enough to go around” has been solved up to the level of a saturation point.
A while back, two more moons were discovered orbiting dwarf planet Pluto (how a planetary body with several decent size satellites can be considered “dwarf” is beyond me, but I digress), giving the far flung member of the solar system a total, so far, of five moons.
Fans of the “Star Trek” sci-fi TV and film series however will know Vulcan is the name of the planet Mr Spock hails from, so it seems to me the title is better left reserved for a Vulcan-like exoplanet, provided its host system is uninhabited that is, that we may one day find, rather than being applied to a moon.
Star Trek Continues, as the name kind of suggests, is a fan made extension of the original 1960’s “Star Trek” sci-fi television series, that picks up where the TV show left off, three years into the illustrious five year mission.
Obviously the actors playing the original show’s well known characters differ, but its essence, I think you will find, remains very much intact.
This is the word for “no”: ghobe’. Try it. No, no, further back in the throat. The ‘gh’ should be almost like a gargle. And what is this “beeehhh”? Are you a sheep? The word ends with a glottal stop. The mark is there for a reason. Close the back of throat abruptly as soon as the vowel escapes – be’! Cut it off like a guillotine!
Sure the Klingons’ words are subtitled, but it seems these captions only tell part of the story. I recently saw a film where someone speaking English was, for some reason, being subtitled in English. What interested me though was the amount of dialogue, admittedly not a great deal, that was not included in the captions.
At least this sort of thing now need not be a problem with future “Stat Trek” movies, as far as the Klingons are concerned anyway.
I don’t usually link to car adverts, but an exception ought to be made in this instance, as both Leonard Nimoy, and Zachary Quinto, who do, or have, played Spock on “Star Trek”, reunite once more onscreen.