Captain, I find your style of fighting to be illogical

Thursday, 4 December, 2014

Captain James T. Kirk, he of “Star Trek” fame, and once commander of the starship USS Enterprise, enjoyed a bit of biffo. Or perhaps that could really be said of William Shatner, who played the well known space explorer.

I remember years ago Shatner saying he was keen to incorporate a little more fighting into the films that the original cast made after the TV series had ended. He wasted little time availing himself of that opportunity when he took on the role of directing the fifth of the “Trek” films, The Final Frontier, in 1989.

I think that was quickly shown to have not helped a great deal though. Now, as if to make matters worse, the logic of Kirk’s hand to hand combat style is being called into question

The axe handle strikes which had served him so well in the past seemed to fail him against Khan. Axe handle strikes, for the ordinary man, are a great way to break your fingers. Perhaps this was bad form catching up with Kirk – who was notorious for not playing by the book.

Read more posts on related topics

, ,

Restoring the USS Enterprise, or would that be a re-fit?

Thursday, 25 September, 2014

USS Enterprise model

The nearly three and a half metre long model of the USS Enterprise, used during the production of the original “Star Trek” television show, that has been suspended from the roof of the gift shop in the Smithsonian Institution for almost the last fourteen years, is to be restored.

I just thought you might like to know that.

Read more posts on related topics

, ,

The original “Star Trek” in the widescreen

Friday, 19 September, 2014

Star Trek widescreen by Nick Acosta

San Francisco based illustrator and concept artist Nick Acosta has created a series of images depicting scenes from the orginal “Star Trek” television show, that, by the way, first went to air forty-eight years ago, in widescreen format. This I could get into I think…

Read more posts on related topics

, , ,

What does the future hold for our systems of government?

Tuesday, 24 June, 2014

Future governments could take a variety of forms, including cyberocracy, rule through “effective use of information”, an artificial intelligence singleton, being rule through an intelligent machine of some sort, Paleolithic politics, should the apocalypse strike, or even a “Star Trek” like global democratic government:

Thus far, globalization appears to be unfolding across three stages. The first phase is cultural globalization, the second economic, and the third political. The first and second stages are largely complete, though some protectionism still exists. The final stage has proven to be the most difficult; nation-states are incredibly hesitant to give up sovereignty. But the dissolution of borders may be an inexorable trend that underlies civilizational development, as witnessed by the unification of China under the Qin Dynasty, the formation of the United States of America, the current experiment known as the European Union, and the likely unification of all African countries. Taken to its logical conclusion, we may eventually achieve a democratic planetary government.

With regions across the globe seemingly demanding more autonomy though, I’m not sure we’re actually going in this direction.

Read more posts on related topics

, ,

We like the new “Star Trek” movies better than the old ones

Tuesday, 8 April, 2014

Ranking the so far twelve “Star Trek” movies by their IMDb rating, reveals fans of the sci-fi franchise have a clear preference for the two “re-booted”, or most recent features, as inspired by the original TV series.

It’s interesting to see the first “Trek” film, Star Trek: The Motion Picture, that was met with – to put it mildly – a mixed reception, appears to have almost the best box office take of the lot. I think that has much to do with its nostalgic appeal at the time of its 1979 release.

I wonder how the upcoming “Star Wars” films will fare, compared to the earlier installments of the saga, in this regard?

Read more posts on related topics

, ,

The economics of the “Star Trek” universe, it’s a free for all

Friday, 29 November, 2013

I’ve seen a fair few “Star Trek” episodes and movies, but cannot recall seeing any of the crew shopping, dining out, or in situations where they are required to fork out money for goods and services. The exception may be when they’ve time travelled into the past, but no transactions appear to take place in the twenty-third century or beyond.

As Captain Kirk tells us during “Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home” though, they don’t use money in their time. If that’s the case, what might a… non-monetary “Star Trek” world look like, if we were part of it? In a word, idealistic would sum it up. Apparently everyone has, or is provided with, everything that they need:

In Star Trek, most economic value is created by essentially free goods. That is the simple explanation as to why we don’t see money exchanged. That is the point of free. But more to the point, one has to think about how much is free in terms of allocations. Researchers on happiness like Justin Wolfers, in my reading, seem to indicate that once we have about $100 million in wealth (based on today’s goods), that is about as happy as people can get. Marginal utility is effectively zero in wealth beyond that point. In Star Trek, at least the closer you get to Sector 001 (or the Solar System), everyone has what, in today’s terms, would be $100 million or more in wealth. The free goods that are provided from housing to technology to services and to Earth and Earth orbit transportation are what would $100 millionaires can get today. They may be the very same humans who are motivated by wealth acquisition as we have today but the economic problem of “not enough to go around” has been solved up to the level of a saturation point.

Read more posts on related topics

, ,

There’s no planet, or moon, by the name of Vulcan in this system

Wednesday, 10 July, 2013

A while back, two more moons were discovered orbiting dwarf planet Pluto (how a planetary body with several decent size satellites can be considered “dwarf” is beyond me, but I digress), giving the far flung member of the solar system a total, so far, of five moons.

Recently a poll was held to name these newly found companions, but the most popular choice, Vulcan, was rejected in favour of the second and third alternatives, Cerberus and Styx. As a name, Vulcan is apparently lacking in underworld connotations, or so we are told.

Fans of the “Star Trek” sci-fi TV and film series however will know Vulcan is the name of the planet Mr Spock hails from, so it seems to me the title is better left reserved for a Vulcan-like exoplanet, provided its host system is uninhabited that is, that we may one day find, rather than being applied to a moon.

Read more posts on related topics

, , ,

Here be the light at the end of Star Trek’s five year mission

Tuesday, 2 July, 2013

I’ve often wondered what might happen at the end, or the limit, of the original “Star Trek” screensaver, that sometimes goes by the name “Starfield”… at least you’d have spent a good twenty years zapping through the cosmos before you found yourself in this situation

Read more posts on related topics

, ,

Somewhere out there Star Trek’s five year mission continues

Monday, 17 June, 2013

Star Trek Continues, as the name kind of suggests, is a fan made extension of the original 1960’s “Star Trek” sci-fi television series, that picks up where the TV show left off, three years into the illustrious five year mission.

Obviously the actors playing the original show’s well known characters differ, but its essence, I think you will find, remains very much intact.

Read more posts on related topics

, ,

Learn Klingon and never be lost in translation again

Monday, 27 May, 2013

I’m not quite sure what to make of the latest Star Trek film Into Darkness, it could be I need to take another look at it, but now that the Klingons have made an entrance into the series, it might be an idea to learn a little of their language:

This is the word for “no”: ghobe’. Try it. No, no, further back in the throat. The ‘gh’ should be almost like a gargle. And what is this “beeehhh”? Are you a sheep? The word ends with a glottal stop. The mark is there for a reason. Close the back of throat abruptly as soon as the vowel escapes – be’! Cut it off like a guillotine!

Sure the Klingons’ words are subtitled, but it seems these captions only tell part of the story. I recently saw a film where someone speaking English was, for some reason, being subtitled in English. What interested me though was the amount of dialogue, admittedly not a great deal, that was not included in the captions.

At least this sort of thing now need not be a problem with future “Stat Trek” movies, as far as the Klingons are concerned anyway.

Read more posts on related topics

, ,